Kimmer Coppejans vs Daniel Michalski Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
L W W W L W W W W LCara A Cara: Coppejans 1 - 0 Michalski
Ellas han jugado 3 conjuntos en total, con Coppejans victoriosa 2 y Michalski victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Coppejans y Michalski fue en el Oeiras 3 Challenger, el 24-06-2022, Cuartos de Quarterfinals, Clay, con Kimmer Coppejans obteniendo la victoria 5-7 7-6(2) 6-3
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
| Daniel Michalski | 0 |
Oeiras 3 Challenger(24-06-2022)
5
7
7
6
6
3
| Coppejans | Estadísticas | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 280 | Ranking | 315 |
| 97 | Highest Rank | 243 |
| 31 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 14 |
| 59% (468-330) | Total de Carrera V/D | 63% (261-152) |
| 70% (23-10) | Ganar/Perder | 71% (22-9) |
| $294,830 | Prize Money de Carrera | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Títulos | 1 |
| 1 | Arcilla H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 18 | Juegos Ganados | 16 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Faltas dobles totales | 2 |
| 2:59:35 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 2:59:35 |
| 68% (65/95) | % De Primer Servicio | 61% (72/118) |
| 71% (46/65) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 56% (40/72) |
| 60% (18/30) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 65% (30/46) |
| 33% (4/12) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 41% (48/118) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 33% (31/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Kimmer Coppejans
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dominic Stricker
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Norbert Gombos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Tiago Pereira
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Daniel Michalski
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Moise Kouame
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Alexey Vatutin
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
84%
(
88 of
105)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jakub Nicod
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Eero Vasa
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
91 of
134)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
55 of
91)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
60 of
134)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (468/330) | Win/Loss | 63% (261/152) |
| 56% (1064/839) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (575/372) |
| 53% (9378/8436) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4668/3937) |
| 62% (140/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (30/32) |
| 61% (308/198) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (226/114) |
| 32% (17/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 25% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2143 | Aces Total | 575 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1801 | Total Double Faults | 833 |
| 1:28:45 | Average Match Time | 1:49:27 |
| 493.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 500.76 |
| 65% (31296/48499) | 1st Serve % | 62% (16739/27165) |
| 67% (21007/31296) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10792/16739) |
| 49% (8361/17203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5356/10426) |
| 44% (2355/5411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1581/3324) |
| 42% (20811/49653) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12233/27516) |
| 52% (34/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 28% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (293/220) | Challenger W/L | 50% (68/69) |
| 75% (127/43) | Futures W/L | 71% (192/78) |
| 59% (462/785) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (257/406) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (56/85) |
| 57% (169/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (71/128) |
| 84% (435/364) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (257/223) |
| 16% (435/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (257/33) |
| 28% (363/103) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (156/37) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
